Alina Korneeva vs Makenna Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Regarding second serve points in recent form, Jones wins 36.68% while Korneeva achieves a higher rate at 39.23%.
• Who has better return game stats? Recently, Jones secures 55.61% of second serve returns, surpassing Korneeva's 49.37%.
• First serve returns favor Korneeva with 43.24%, while Jones claims 36.32%.
• Under pressure, Jones saves 51.17% of breakpoints as compared to Korneeva's 38.71%.
• In the past year, Jones has a win rate of 52.08% (25/23), slightly lower than Korneeva's 57.89% (11/8).
• Performance on hard courts shows Korneeva with a significant advantage, winning 80% versus Jones' 61%.
• Both players compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Korneeva having a higher win percentage of 58.33%.
• The average rank of opponents favors Korneeva, facing players ranked 146.89 against Jones' 369.19.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Jones has the upper hand with a 75% win rate as opposed to Korneeva’s 50%.
• Breakpoint conversions are crucial under pressure; Korneeva outperforms with a 50% conversion rate compared to Jones’ 40.63%.

Editorial Prediction (June 17, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the head-to-head statistics between Jones and Korneeva, several factors emerge as decisive in predicting the outcome of their match. Korneeva holds a slight upper hand in their recent performance on second serves, with a superior conversion rate on break points adding to her edge during crucial moments in the game.

Return game statistics present a more balanced view, with Jones demonstrating a strong ability to win points off second serves, yet Korneeva excels at managing first serve returns. This dynamic indicates that while both players have strengths, Korneeva's ability to handle pressure and capitalize on first serve returns can prove pivotal.

In evaluating overall career performance on hard courts, Korneeva significantly outshines Jones, supporting her as a strong contender on this surface type. Furthermore, Korneeva has been competing against higher-ranked opponents, which indicates exposure to formidable competition.

While Jones has a greater likelihood of coming out on top if the match extends to a deciding set, Korneeva’s consistent form and strategic advantages, such as breakpoint conversion, suggest she is better prepared to handle pivotal moments.

Based on these insights, Korneeva is likely to emerge as the winner of the upcoming tennis match.